This article focuses on the interaction between intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes and committee-based standards development organisations (SDOs) in terms of the commodification of knowledge. IPRs and SDOs are institutions that are designed to codify technical knowledge with quite different purposes though. The resulting documents describe a private right (patent) or a public good (a standard). The article associates the former with a commodification and the latter with a de-commodification process of technical knowledge, and it explores a situation in which these respective purposes have come into conflict. The scope for conflict is examined and analysed in light of the controversy, which emerged during the standardization of GSM ...
During the early 1990s, several international standards development organizations including the IEEE...
This paper investigates the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the process of standardiz...
Recent cases such as Continental v. Avanci and FTC v. Qualcomm drew attention to the limits of prote...
This article focuses on the interaction between intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes and comm...
This article focuses on the interaction between intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes and comm...
In today's environment of rapidly evolving information and communication technologies (ICTs), techni...
During the early 1990s, several international standards development organizations including the IEEE...
Competition and intellectual property rights (IPRs) are both necessary for a market to work efficien...
The relationship between standards and intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a complementary but tr...
The relationship between standards and intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a complementary but tr...
This paper takes a fresh and comprehensive look at how intellectual property rights (IPR) interact w...
Competition and intellectual property rights (IPRs) are both necessary for a market to work efficien...
International audiencethis article starts by discussing the nature of European formal telecommunicat...
Patents and other industrial IPRs have the potential to undermine the collective pursuit of a techni...
This paper takes a fresh and comprehensive look at how intellectual property rights (IPR) interact w...
During the early 1990s, several international standards development organizations including the IEEE...
This paper investigates the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the process of standardiz...
Recent cases such as Continental v. Avanci and FTC v. Qualcomm drew attention to the limits of prote...
This article focuses on the interaction between intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes and comm...
This article focuses on the interaction between intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes and comm...
In today's environment of rapidly evolving information and communication technologies (ICTs), techni...
During the early 1990s, several international standards development organizations including the IEEE...
Competition and intellectual property rights (IPRs) are both necessary for a market to work efficien...
The relationship between standards and intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a complementary but tr...
The relationship between standards and intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a complementary but tr...
This paper takes a fresh and comprehensive look at how intellectual property rights (IPR) interact w...
Competition and intellectual property rights (IPRs) are both necessary for a market to work efficien...
International audiencethis article starts by discussing the nature of European formal telecommunicat...
Patents and other industrial IPRs have the potential to undermine the collective pursuit of a techni...
This paper takes a fresh and comprehensive look at how intellectual property rights (IPR) interact w...
During the early 1990s, several international standards development organizations including the IEEE...
This paper investigates the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the process of standardiz...
Recent cases such as Continental v. Avanci and FTC v. Qualcomm drew attention to the limits of prote...